Native Document Production


Confused about producing native files? Not sure whether you’re adhering to the Federal Rules? SIRC can help you choose the optimal, most cost-effective solution for your document production.


To TIFF or not to TIFF?


A standard production of TIFF images generated from native files includes images, extracted text, and metadata information.

Why convert to TIFF for production?


  • Creates static version of the document collection.
  • Enables page-level Bates numbering.
  • Allows you to redact documents.
  • Gives you control of text and metadata information.


Why would you choose a different production format?


  • TIFF conversion is typically the most expensive option.
  • TIFF conversion takes more time than a native file production.
  • Your opponent may object to this type of production.

Producing in Native Format


For email, there are three common native production options:

  • Produce email in its original format (typically Microsoft Outlook PST files or Lotus Notes NSF files).
  • Produce emails as individual messages with the attachments embedded (Microsoft Outlook MSG files).
  • Produce email messages in HTML format and provide attachments in their native format as stand-alone files.

There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these approaches, but the primary reasons for choosing a native production are:

  • It costs less and is typically quicker to create than TIFF conversion.
  • You are providing the documents in their original format so there is less opportunity for your opponent to object to it.
  • You may be required to by the court or by agreement with opposing counsel.

The disadvantages of this approach include:

  • No page level control, so pages cannot be numbered or redacted.
  • Limited control over production of metadata and text of native files.
  • Difficult to authenticate documents in filings, depositions, or court proceedings.